woensdag 24 augustus 2016

One of the First serious Documentations of the French Paris Mai/June 68 movement Graphic Design


1969; Haan, Tristan; Parijs , mei-juni ' 68 : tentoonstelling onder auspiciën van het Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis; one of the first serious documentations of the French Mai/June 68 movement, with explanations of the many organisations, groups and groupscules (taxonomie of a forest of acronyms); all material can be found in the archives of the IISG, though no concordance register has been made to my knowledge between the archives and the catlogue; a great pitty that all this information is only available in Dutch.

See also

Paris a brulé THE PROTEST PHOTOBOOK 1956 – 2013 MARTIN PARR GERRY BADGER Pierre Juillet Christian Joubert Michel Hermans Photography


what
The first exhibition on the French May June 1968 movement took place in the Museum Fodor in Amsterdam, an annex of the museum of modern art (Stedelijk Museum). At that time such a thing could not take place in France were people could still be persecuted for certain deeds during the rising and even having lots of protest documentation could make one a suspect. Through a collaboration between the Stedelijk Museum and the International Institute of Social History (IISG), both based in Amsterdam, this exhibition could take place. The IISG had been collecting historical documents from and about revolutionary, workers and social movement since 1935 (a Dutch initiative as a reaction on the take over of power by the Nazis in Germany and Austria and the endangered socialist archives). Also this time the IISG saw it as its task to actively collect materials of the French May movement on the spot. The Institute had already some collecting ’consultants’ in France and several staff members from Amsterdam went to France to add with this task. There were also many people related in some way to the Institute who did the same thing on their own initiative. From July onward with the movement going down several people in France feared strong repression and were looking for a safe place to store documentation they had gathered and donated it to the IISG. All this came together and already in the summer of 1968 a big collection of all kind of documents had been established in Amsterdam.

The most primary documents were the leaflets and handouts of thousands of different initiatives, often duplicated, or printed in a simple way. Next came the posters and handwritten manifestos of all kind of sizes and with a great variety of subjects. Though nowadays the strong graphic language of the silkscreened posters produced at ‘atelier de beaux arts’ in Paris are mostly remembered, these were certainly not the first ones, and in fact the text based mostly handwritten wall papers and manifestos with all kind of declarations and calls are much more typical for the May 68 movement. New newspapers, magazines, journals, and dispatches of all kind were brought forth by this movement, some with strong graphics like the paper ‘Action’. Comments, proposals, manifestos, programs and the like in the form of brochures (pamphlets) flooded the bookshops and news stalls, were handed out, or sold on the streets. Photographers, filmmakers and radio journalists made all kind of independent registrations, like an association of independent filmmakers that undertook newsreel productions, taking the name ‘Etats Géneraux du Cinéma”. Of course the movement also reflected on existing news media that often published special editions or issues. Already during the first month books started to come out, documenting specific events, discussing or reflecting.

All this material had to be ordered in some way to show it and make it understandable. The head of the French department of the IISG, Tristan Haan, who before that time had been sunk deep into the 18th century and the radical writings of ”le curé Meslier”, woke up to the present and made 244 short descriptions and commentaries of such time documents, adding an overview of 153 groups and their obscure acronyms and abbreviations, many of which only existed for a few weeks. This formed the basis for the catalogue that showed also 135 leaflets, handwritten manifestos and posters, all translated into Dutch. The catalogue was a low budget production, so only pure black and white reproduction could be afforded at that time (even making rasters pictures would have been too expensive; difficult to understand for new generation working with graphic computer systems). Still when I leaf through the catalogue now in 2005 it breathes a graphic atmosphere that relates well with the spirit of the 68 movement.

There were film showings with life translations during the exhibition. The catalogue had special sections on movies and gramophone record documents and an international documentation of the 68 movement in the world of art.

Maybe here should also be noted that the Stedelijk Museum direction was not all that happy about this initiative. They somewhat feared its revolutionary impact, so when we proposed to hang the reprints of some May 68 posters, like the one with the clubbing CRS riot policeman, on the official advertisement boards of the museum had, this was refused. It took a decade or so before all the simple handwritten and badly duplicated documents were forgotten and only the nice and artistic looking documents could get popular with the curators and were often selected in museum exhibitions as emblems of Mai 68.

After 25 years the French archival institutions had catched up and even did better than us foreign pioneering documentarists. The National Library of France undertook a serious project to catalogue all the leaflets they had been able to put their hands on and even initiated a microfilmed edition that has preserved all together 10.067 handouts/leaflets of the May/June 1968 movement.

why
“Mai 68” has become the shortest way to denote a whole complex of social movements in the spring of 1968 in France and elsewhere, with May as the hot spot and June as a month of cool down.

Ten years before general De Gaulle had been elected president and founded what is called the “Ve Republique” with new strong presidential powers. A technocrat policy was pursued, by a center-right majority government, to modernize France, an imperial power that had just lost its colonies and still was a half agricultural, half industrial country. While major efforts were made to push a new high tech industry that would provide both cheap energy and military nuclear power, changes in other domains lacked behind. Former agricultural workers and small farmers had been driven from the fields into the new factories, soon demanding better working conditions which were most often denied. The educational domain, that had to supply the cadre for the new industrial order, had grown in size but failed to adapt to the demands of the younger generation. It was not surprising that something stirred up here, at first with small groups of students criticizing their own living conditions and future prospects in Strasbourg in 1966 (with the pamphlet “De la misère dans le millieu étudiant”/about he misery of student life) and later in the new Parisian suburban university of Nanterre in January 1968. During the opening ceremony of a new swimming pool, students interrupted the French minister of sports Missoffe who proclaimed that this pool was a sign of how the government took good care of the health of the students. The interruption was about the repressive role of sport and the strict gender separation in the dormitories of the Nanterre university campus and the resulting “unhygienic mental situation” for students because of their frustrated sexuality (a way of arguing coming directly from the writings of Wilhelm Reich in the thirties, rediscovered by French youth at that time). This last incident was the beginning of a series of conflicts at the Nanterre campus and led to its closure in March. This only radicalized the student movement. At the same time there were all kind or worker’s protest and action outside the Paris region, like in Caen at the SAVIEM factory. It certainly was not only a student movement, though at first they did get most of the publicity.

During the first of May demonstration in Paris, that was for the first time since long officially allowed, students from Nanterre that tried to join in were chased from the march by Communist Party trade unionists(CGT). For a long time there had been frictions between the rather orthodox French Communist Party and other socialist parties, unions and groupings. A period of oscillating events starts: demonstrations, counter-demonstrations provocations: like an arson attack of a student office at the Sorbonne - possibly by a right wing group - and protests meeting against it in the University compound. When the protesters are chased out by the police, the movement spreads over the neighbouring quarter, the Quartier Latin. The student movement is out in the streets. More demonstrations and closures of Universities follow. The movement widens, involving also high school students. Hard confrontations between demonstrators and police, defense and storming of old fashioned barricades that block Parisian boulevards. More and more arrests, wounded and people troubled by what appears in some case to have been more than “just” tear gas (some say it was nerve gas). The student movement triggers more social unrest, in all parts of the country occupations of factories occur, like Sud Aviation in Nantes and Renault in Cléon. Journalists of the ORTF (French state radio and television) form a committee. In Paris the Odéon theater is occupied and functions as a permanent platform for debates on social issues. Solidarity demonstration of students and workers occur, railways and air traffic is blocked by strikes. Not all strikes are called by the trade unions, several are directly initiated by workers, wild-cat strikes. All kind of sectors of society start to express their grievances with the existing system, school teachers, parents of school kids, art students, journalists, neighbourhood committees, an action committee in the National Library, even sport professionals who issue a leaflet with the slogan “le football aux footballeurs (football to the football players). Several university buildings are occupied, not just in Paris but also in the province.

All this seems to have little effect on the level of official politics. A vote of censure in the national assembly on the 22. of May is repulsed. A proposal for amnesty for arrested students is accepted as an attempt to still the uproar. All kind of action committees are formed to discuss social issues of a specific segment of society and take practical action. A general assembly with representatives of over a hundred of such committees takes place in Paris. There are some television speeches of president De Gaulle, at first disavowing, later promising a national referendum on a change of social structures that would allow for more “participation” of French citizens. Behind doors negotiations between trade unions and government start, while the movement continues on the streets and in occupied educational institutions and factories. The workers of the Renault Billancourt factories in Paris refuse to accept the first negotiation results of their unions. Mass meetings follow, the government can not deny or ignore the movement anymore. At first the minister of education Perefitte is dismissed and soon after, on May 30, president De Gaulle dismisses the parliament, new elections are announced. A call is launched for the forming of ‘citizens militia’ to defend the Republic. A big demonstration of Gaullist supporters marches down the Champs Elysée.

Describing the aftermath in the same way will go beyond the purpose of this short overview. Slowly over the weeks the waves of social unrest calm down. The trade unions declare that they had no political intend with the strikes, just economic demands and start to force the striking workers to accept the agreement with the government (called the “accords of Grenelle”, after the street where the negotiations took place). The elections at the end of June do not alter the relations between the political parties. The left opposition is at that time too much divided to offer an alternative. It takes till 1981, when the newly formed French Socialist Party under Mitterand, succeeds in allying (however temporarily) most of the left political forces, getting both a parliamentary majority and the presidency, though only for a short while...












dinsdag 16 augustus 2016

Views & Reviews Photographing Japan’s most ancient folkloric Traditions Charles Fréger Photography


Photographing Japan’s most ancient folkloric traditions
Written by Tom Seymour

Images from the series Yokainoshima: Island of Monsters © Charles Fréger, courtesy Thames & Hudson

Extraordinary photographs of Japanese folk costume and ritual – from Charles Fréger, the celebrated author of Wilder Mann - are published in a new photobook.

In rural Japan, the passage of the year is marked by festivals and rituals held amid the changing seasons. And, at New Year, strange creatures come down from the mountains.

They come to deliver a message to the people below, and frighten their children.


These are the Toshigami, also known as Namahage in Akita province, or Suneka in Iwate.

French photographer Charles Fréger went to meet these folkloric creatures face to face for his series Yokainoshima – a neologism that translates as ‘island of monsters’.


Elaborate outfits, crafted from textiles and elements from the natural environment, are donned in agricultural and fishing communities throughout the country to celebrate seasonal rites of fertility and abundance.

There are also many rituals relating to longevity, prosperity and warding off misfortune. In these too, spirit ‘visitors’, believed to come from the sea, the mountains and the sky are welcomed into communities across the Japanese archipelago.


Over the course of two years, Fréger journeyed the length of Japan, from north to south, photographing yokai, oni or Toshigami figures as they enacted rituals intended to ensure a fertile harvest, and to chase away evil spirits.

As a counterpoint to Fréger’s earlier Wilder Mann series, devoted to ‘wild’ figures from European folk culture, Yokainoshima presents the subjects in staged poses and settings evoking the landscapes of Japan, while settings for the yokai, by young architect Jumpei Matsushima, emphasises their colourful costumes still further.


Fréger’s portraits are framed with essays written by Toshiharu Ito and Akihiro Hatanaka, specialists in Japanese folk culture and anthropology, which set the huge variety of eclectic clothing in ethnographic context whilst describing the many local festivals, dances and rituals they represent.


As Ito, a specialist in Japanese folk culture and anthropology, writes in his essay: “Fréger’s distinctive method of distillation contrasts composition and repetition, colour and location, rhythm and pattern, posture and movement, the artificial and the natural.”

Yokainoshima: Island of Monsters is available now from Thames & Hudson. For more information, see here.

Yôkai in het wild

Alleen in Japan kan dit eiland bestaan, waar mensen en geesten samenleven. En de enige die ze van dichtbij heeft gezien, is fotograaf Charles Fréger. Hij legde de monsters in het wild vast, op het onvindbare eiland Yokainoshima.

Het eiland Onigashima, een van de vele, kleine mythische eilanden aan de kust van Japan, lijkt op het eerste gezicht onbewoond. Kaal, verlaten. De bewoners verwachten geen bezoek. Ze speuren het vasteland af, op zoek naar luie, ijdele zondaars die een lesje en een tik verdienen. Mensen zijn er niet, en dat is maar goed ook.

Alleen op Yokainoshima (eiland van de Yôkai) leven mensen schouder aan schouder met de soort die al vele namen heeft gekend: geesten, noemen we ze, energieën, trollen, demonen, feeën. De Japanners spreken van Yôkai. Eilandbewoners communiceren met de Yôkai door middel van uitbundige rituelen, waarbij de mens in de huid van de geest kruipt. De geest zou de mens op Yokainoshima voor zijn spiegelbeeld aanzien: de mens draagt een riem met 81 bamboestokken, stuk voor stuk drie meter lang, elk versierd met vijftien bloemen. Een paraplu van vruchtbaarheid, en wie eronder staat, heeft geluk. De mens danst een leeuwendans om het dorp te beschermen voor het kwaad van buitenaf. De mens verstopt zich achter rode maskers en achter grote bijlen waarmee geesten onder het aardoppervlak wakker worden geklopt voor de zomer. Zo vraagt de mens de Yôkai om hulp bij droogte, overstroming, plagen en orkanen.

Engelen op je schouder
‘Ooit leek me dit eiland, waar werelden naast elkaar bestaan en mensen en geesten samenleven, doodnormaal,’ schrijft de Japanse vertaalster en dichteres Ryoko Sekiguchi in het voorwoord. ‘Pas toen ik mijn thuisland verliet, kwam ik er achter dat zo’n wereld nergens anders bestaat.’

‘Wil je zeggen dat in dit land alleen mensen en dieren leven?’ vroeg ze aan haar nieuwe Franse vrienden. ‘Er moet toch meer zijn? Je weet waar ik het over heb, toch? Heb je ze werkelijk nog nooit gezien?’

Nee, zeiden haar vrienden, er is hier in Frankrijk geen geest te bekennen. Boom na boom wordt gekapt, zonder dat er iemand voor heeft moeten boeten. Geen boom, geen struik, geen konijn of klaproos wordt herdacht. De bewakers van de natuur hoeven in Frankrijk niet op een bedankje te rekenen: Yokainoshima ligt ver achter de horizon.

 Waar precies, dat weet Ryoko niet. Alleen in haar gedachten zette ze voet aan land, maar ze kent het eiland van de Yôkai uit haar gedachten. We kennen ze allemaal: het zijn de kabouters die je kamer opruimen als jij het niet doet, die de slingers ophangen nog vóór je jarig uit je bed stapt. Het zijn de engelen op je schouder die aan je stuur trekken en een slippende tegenligger ontwijken, die je een stap opzij laten zetten voordat er in je verse voetafdrukken een piano te pletter valt. Het zijn de schaduwen in de hoek die naar je staren zodra je het licht uit doet, en het monster in het donker onder je bed.

Vervelende Franse geesten
De enige die de Yôkai ooit van dichtbij heeft gezien, is fotograaf Charles Fréger: van 2013 tot 2015 zocht hij ze vijf keer op en legde ze vast. De monsters in het wild, ontdaan van rituele feestelijkheden. Poten (voeten) in het zand, haren (stro) in de wind. Met een boek vol foto’s keerde hij ongedeerd terug naar Frankrijk. Toch lukt het ook Fréger niet het eiland op de kaart aan te wijzen. Vijf keer vond hij Yokainoshima, maar nooit op dezelfde plaats. Sommigen zeggen dat hij het eiland verzonnen heeft, met Yôkai en al. ‘Een uitvinding’ noemt hij het zelf.

‘Maar nu ze gefotografeerd zijn, leven ze op papier,’ zegt Ryoko. Ze hebben de oceaan doorkruist en zijn naar het Westen gekomen in de tas van Charles Fréger. Ze hebben hun spullen gepakt, zijn geëmigreerd en burgeren langzaam in. ‘De Fransen moeten ze nog een beetje leren kennen,’ schrijft de dichteres. Hoe Franser de geesten zijn, hoe vervelender. ‘Die ene die het laatste stukje toiletpapier opeet als ik al geplast heb. Die is vast en zeker Frans.’

Een tijdje woonde er eentje bij haar in. ‘Als ik thuiskwam, stonden er noedels voor me klaar. Ik was zo eenzaam tijdens mijn eerste paar jaren in Frankrijk. Vanuit mijn eigen appartement zag ik hoe gelukkig andere huishoudens eruitzagen. Ik was zo ontzettend jaloers. Het monster voelde dat ik ongelukkig was en is voor mij van Yokainoshima naar een ver, ver land verhuisd. Ik zie het nog voor me, hoe hij speelde met de radijsjes op het balkon. Wie weet waar hij nu is?’

Charles Fréger, ‘Yokainoshima, Island of Monsters. Japanese folk rituals’, Thames & Hudson 2016, 256 p.
De tentoonstelling is nog tot 25 september te zien is op Les rencontres d’Arles in Frankrijk.



















zondag 14 augustus 2016

Views & Reviews Our Kind of People: American Groups and Rituals The Best Photobooks About America Bill Owens Photography


Our Kind of People: American Groups and Rituals, Bill Owens 
Published by Straight Arrow Books



Selected by Paul Moakley, deputy director of photography, TIME:"While working as a newspaper photographer in California, Bill Owens always shot his assignments while building a body of personal work examining American culture away the city. His first book, the now iconic Suburbia, opened the doors to the middle class American home after the 1960s to depict its residents struggling with a radically shifting cultural landscape and a distant war in Vietnam. The ironies between his photos and captions set up an environment that might have felt all too complacent in its search for comfortable convience. His follow up, Our Kind Of People, examines the rituals of groups coming together in the suburbs once again to have organized fun and camaraderie, but Owens always manages to see through the façades of religion, patriotism, costumes and cheap disposable cutlery to see a party that’s starting to feel tired."

Bill Owens
Dates born 1938
Roles Photographer
Nationality American

Bill Owens's 1972 book Suburbia met with immediate success for its keen observation of middle-class America. Owens had recorded a generational phenomenon: the rapid migration of inner city apartment dwellers to affordable, newly produced homes in city outskirts. He realized that this wasn't simply a demographic shift but a psychological one. Social critics had mocked the suburbs for their apparent conformity and spiritual emptiness. But Owens respected the liberation that many suburbanites felt, and their determination to build better lives.

Introduced to photography while a Peace Corps volunteer, Owens studied at San Francisco State College until he was hired as a staff photographer for the local newspaper in Livermore, an East Bay suburb of San Francisco. His fascination with the people and lifestyles he encountered while working for The Independent from 1968 to 1978 led to self-assigned shoots on the weekends. Although Owens never completed college, he credited several professors for their influence: John Gardner, who enabled him to realize that he was "a good storyteller," and John Collier, whose book Visual Anthropology: Photography As a Research Method, gave him a practical approach.

Suburbia, which documented the San Francisco East Bay suburbs, is the first in a series of four books Owens published dedicated to the American dream. Our Kind of People(1975)followed as an examination of political, religious, scholastic, and sports groups, while Working: I Do It for the Money(1977), which looked at people in nine-to-five day jobs. For his fourth book,Leisure(2004), Owens included color photographs. After a period of almost twenty years, during which time he abandoned photography and operated a successful brewery, Owens continues to examine American society through digital photography and movie making.

ART/ARCHITECTURE; A Vision of Suburban Bliss Edged With Irony
By JEFFREY KASTNER
Published: March 19, 2000

THE picture on the back cover of the new edition of Bill Owens's classic 1970's photographic essay, ''Suburbia,'' says much about when and where it was taken, and about the delicate balancing act that characterizes the project of which it is a part. In the image, a young couple stand in their large, immaculate kitchen. On the table in front of them sit two icons of abundance, a bowl overflowing with preternaturally shiny fruit and a chubby baby. The stylish mother distractedly guides creamed corn into the child's mouth, while Dad clutches a freshly poured cocktail. As is often the case with Mr. Owens's images, a quote from the subjects serves as the photo's caption: ''We're really happy. Our kids are healthy, we eat good food, and we have a really nice home.''

Healthy kids, a nice house, a cocktail in the evening, connubial bliss. From our vantage today, across a 30-year gap overgrown with irony, the sentiments expressed by the couple might seem quaint, as outdated as the groovy beads and horn-rim glasses they sport. Indeed, the whole thing might seem like an easy joke at their expense, were it not, on some basic level, so totally true. We know almost nothing about these people. But for the moment, in their comfortable home, with their baby and their bounty, they do seem really happy in a way that many of us would like to be. So is this an admiring depiction of a middle-class American dream come true or an ironic expose of bourgeois materialism? In the carefully calibrated context of ''Suburbia,'' it turns out to be a little of each.

Considered a groundbreaking exemplar of documentary photography upon its publication in 1972, ''Suburbia'' later went out of print, dropping off the radar in much the same way its creator did. By the end of that decade -- after showing at institutions like the Museum of Modern Art and the Smithsonian, winning major awards and producing two more books -- he decided he could no longer raise a family on a photographer's wages and quit the art world. Now ''Suburbia'' is available in a new edition, with a foreword by the journalist and social historian David Halberstam, published late last year by Fotofolio. And Mr. Owens, today better known as an authority on brewing beer, is suddenly in vogue again, showing in major galleries from New York to Paris and, through April 2, in a retrospective at the San Jose Museum of Art in San Jose, Calif.

Speaking by telephone from the Hayward, Calif., office where he publishes American Brewer magazine, the 61-year-old Mr. Owens recounted the development of the ''Suburbia'' project. Born in San Jose and raised on a farm in Citrus Heights, he was an indifferent student who flunked out of college and set off on an around-the-world hitchhiking trip. After returning to finish school at Chico State College, he did a Peace Corps stint in Jamaica. When a photographer visited the village in which he was teaching, Mr. Owens's interest was piqued. He soon picked up the camera and taught himself how to shoot.

On his return to California, Mr. Owens found work as a $112-a-week news photographer for a small newspaper, The Livermore Independent, in the Bay Area. ''I'd been traveling the world,'' he said, ''and suddenly I got to Livermore and I was in total culture shock. I had a wife and a baby and everybody my age already had the house and the swimming pool and the two cars. I'm shooting the Rotary Club, the Junior Women's Club and thinking, 'Who are these people?' But I start to get to know them. I'd go out and shoot them for the newspaper and then think, 'Man, I ought to go back and shoot this on my own time.' ''

Eager to make the jump from his journalistic work to a full-blown documentary project, Mr. Owens approached the publisher of a local magazine, who agreed to purchase some prints. He used the money to buy a large-format camera and, scaling back his time at the paper, began working on ''Suburbia,'' shooting every Saturday over the next year.

An admirer of photographers like Robert Frank and Bruce Davidson, Mr. Owens initially saw ''Suburbia'' less as an art project than as a kind of anthropological document. Referring to the New Deal Farm Security Administration, Mr. Owens said: ''I was really influenced by the photographs from the F.S.A. projects. There's one F.S.A. photo that always stuck in my mind. It's a picture of a woman, her back is turned to the camera, and all there are on the walls and along the counter are cabinets. I always wanted to open up the cabinets and photograph what was inside.''

With ''Suburbia,'' Mr. Owens got his chance. Using contacts made through his newspaper work, as well as through classified ads seeking subjects for a project on suburban life, he insinuated himself into the lives of friends and neighbors who sought comfort and prosperity in the growing suburbs of northern California. He opened the door on their shag carpeting and flowered wallpaper; their mirrored bedrooms and paneled rec rooms; their miniskirts and go-go boots. Whether vacuuming or folding clothes, paying bills or fixing dinner, the people in Mr. Owens's photographs always seem entirely themselves, for better or worse.

The individual pictures in ''Suburbia'' may sometimes seem narrow in their documentation of such details, but the story they tell in aggregate is universal, one of aspiration -- for a better place with better things, a new way of life in new surroundings, a piece of the American dream. Yet for all the richness of the images Mr. Owens made, it was his decision to pair many of them with quotes he gathered from the subjects -- after his editor at Straight Arrow Books, the Rolling Stone imprint that originally published ''Suburbia,'' told him he had to get releases from everyone he had shot -- that gave the project its indelible poignancy.

Whether the subjects are speaking of their possessions or their politics, the captions allow the viewer to measure these people's image of themselves against the image they present, their hopes and fears against the quotidian circumstances of their lives. ''I get a lot of compliments on the front room wall,'' says a carefully coiffed matron in her slightly surreal-looking sitting room. ''I like Italian Syrocco floral designs over the mantle. It goes well with the Palos Verde rock fireplace.'' And a young mother in curlers stands with an infant in a messy kitchen and wonders, ''How can I worry about the damned dishes when there are children dying in Vietnam?''

''Suburbia'' sold well for a photo book, going into several printings. It also earned Mr. Owens a reputation in the art world, gaining him a Guggenheim fellowship and a pair of National Endowment for the Arts grants that supported his next projects, a book on groups and rituals called ''Our Kind of People'' and ''Working,'' which documented Americans on the job. But by 1978, as he embarked on his fourth book project, focusing on leisure time, Mr. Owens found himself increasingly frustrated with the life of the artist. ''I had no money,'' he said. ''I couldn't make a living. Then one day I found my Nikon under the seat of my car and I realized I wasn't a photographer anymore.''

Reviving an interest in home brewing, Mr. Owens began to study beer-making, eventually opening one of the nation's first brew pubs, Buffalo Bill's, in Hayward in 1983. He later opened several more and eventually began publishing trade magazines for the industry. It was not until the early 1990's, after much urging by his longtime friend and patron, Dr. Robert Harshorn Shimshak, that Mr. Owens started to think about photography again.

''We had gotten to know each other in the late 1970's and stayed friends,'' said Dr. Shimshak, a physician and Bay Area art collector. ''I was over at his place in 1992 or 1993 and I asked him what he was doing with his work -- was he at least taking care of the negatives? Bill said, 'They're all in a trunk in the basement' and I had a fit. He said, 'Well, if you love them so much, why don't you take care of them?' He put the negatives in my car and said, 'They're yours now.' ''

It was Dr. Shimshak who suggested a new edition of ''Suburbia.'' Acting as editor, he reworked the book's sequencing, replaced some of the original black-and-whites and added 20 new color images, taken in the late 70's. ''The more I collected art,'' Dr. Shimshak said, ''the more I realized that Bill's work wasn't just influential in the photo world, but also in the art world as a whole. He was one of the first people to look at something commonplace, and then take a picture of it that made you really look at it, too.''

Almost every photo in ''Suburbia'' repays attentive looking, with details that turn an average photo into a great one. ''We're really happy . . .'' is a case in point. It turns out that the couple in the picture was chosen not because of its neatly nuclear family, but because Mr. Owens wanted pictures of people with pets and they had 23 cats -- a half-dozen of which appear, on closer examination, lurking in the corners of the composition.

Indeed, the cats are not the only stealthy aspect of the image: subtle dissonances abound, giving it that tension between celebration and critique that is a trademark of Mr. Owens's best work. For instance, a longer look confirms that one of the symbols of plenty that attend the couple, the bowl of fruit, is as plastic as the tile-pattern linoleum under their feet. And despite the sunny positivism on the picture's surface, dusk is falling outside. Through the sliding glass door, beyond the daisy appliques, you can make out a power plant in the fading light, its buzzing towers marching across the horizon, its wires crazing the sunset like hairline cracks in the otherwise picture-perfect world of suburbia.

Photos: ''We're really happy,'' said one couple, top, who were among the dozens of subjects and scenes photographed by Bill Owens in his 1970's classic ''Suburbia.'' (Photographs by Bill Owens/From ''Suburbia'' (Fotofolio, 1999))
Jeffrey Kastner's most recent article for Arts & Leisure was about the artists Kristin Jones and Andrew Ginzel.